BOHS “Good Practice Guide for Consultants”

BOHS “Good Practice Guide for Consultants”

This BOHS guide sets out good practice expectations for organisations providing occupational hygiene consultancy services, including sole traders, SMEs and larger consultancies.

It covers competence, supervision, insurance, ethics, survey design, report writing, quality assurance and quality control.  The guide is particularly relevant where buyers rely on external occupational hygiene advice following the decline of in-house occupational hygiene capability.  BOHS highlights concerns around poorly specified work, inadequate supervision of trainees or technicians, and technically flawed reports.

This resource is relevant to:

  • Occupational Hygienists
  • LEV Consultants
  • P601 TExT Engineers
  • Health & Safety Professionals
  • Duty Holders
  • Technical Report Reviewers

Source Document

View the BOHS Guide here:

Source: British Occupational Hygiene Society (BOHS)
Document Type: Good Practice Guide
Status: Version 2, Jan 2021
Last reviewed by LEVCentral: June 2026

LEVCentral Expert Commentary

This guide is highly relevant to the LEV sector because many of the same professional weaknesses seen in Occupational Hygiene Consultancy are also seen in LEV design, commissioning, testing and reporting.

BOHS emphasises that competence is not simply a qualification; it includes training, experience, supervision, CPD and quality assurance.  The guide also makes clear that trainees and technicians should not be allowed to operate beyond their competence without adequate supervision.

For LEV work, the most important parallel is report quality.  BOHS states that reports should not merely present results, but should provide clear conclusions and recommendations that help the duty holder reduce exposure and comply with relevant legislation.

The guide also supports a defensible approach to consultancy governance: quotations should be properly scoped, sampling strategies should be risk-based, work should be reviewed by competent senior staff, and reports should be subject to quality control before issue.

Further Resources

Recommended Learning

Thought Leadership